Link: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/08/05/138998928/usdas-advice-for-eating-right-is-hard-on-the-wallet
There are myriad reasons why it's tough to follow a healthful diet in this day and age, and the formidable obesity epidemic in this country is a testament to the fact that too many of us simply can't do it.
The government, in theory, wants to lead us down a more healthful path, with tactics like the Dietary Guidelines, updated every five years with the latest nutritional science and suggestions for how to balance meals.
But fruits and veggies can be pricey relative to sugary, fatty foods, and the guidelines don't really help consumers on a tight budget figure out how to boost their intake of these healthful foods, public health experts say.
Today, researchers at the University of Washington published a study in Health Affairs that looked at four nutrients — potassium, fiber, Vitamin D and calcium — which the most recent set of guidelines (released in January) said we weren't eating enough of.
What they found among people they surveyed in the Seattle area was that consuming the recommended amounts of these four nutrients would make the average person's food bill go up — by as much as $380 per year with just one of the nutrients (potassium). That is too much for some low-income families, they say.
"We're trying to understand the dietary imbalance, and our study shows there's an economic layer to it, which the Dietary Guidelines don't account for," Pablo Monsivais, an epidemiologist at the University of Washington and the lead author of the study, tells Shots. "In theory it's possible for people to meet the guidelines, but they would have to be reoriented towards the lowest-cost foods."
Monsivais and his colleagues conducted a random telephone survey of about 2,000 adults in King County, Wash., on what they ate and how much they spent on food. They followed up with a questionnaire in the mail to which about 1,300 people responded.
On the question of potassium, respondents said they consumed an average of 2,800 milligrams per day — 700 milligrams less than what the guidelines recommend. The researchers calculated that it would cost them an extra $1.04 a day, or $380 per year, to meet the guideline.
Potassium isn't inherently expensive, the study notes – bananas and potatoes are cheap ways to get it — but many people wouldn't necessarily go for those foods if they were trying to boost their potassium, based on what they currently eat.
Monsivais has an idea, though, of what an affordable "MyPlate" would look like: It would be filled with lentils, cabbage, eggs, and carrots. And for dessert? Oranges, apples or bananas — all nutritious and cheap.
Another way to get people to eat more nutritious food is to help families on food assistance shop at farmers' markets. The Health Affairs study references Boston Bounty Bucks, a program that makes it easier for food stamp users to go to 21 farmers markets around Boston. All purchases made at these markets with the federal government's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, are matched up to $10 by the BBB.
The Union of Concerned Scientists coincidentally released a report today also encouraging the government to do more to make the healthful fruits and vegetables at farmers' markets accessible to the poor.
"What we want to see are policies to allow low-income people to redeem their food assistance benefits at farmers markets," UCS economist and report author Jeffrey O'Hara tells Shots. "Some states don't even allow it, and there is evidence that these benefits work well for low-income people and actually help them increase their food and vegetable consumption."
Discussion Questions:
ReplyDelete1) What other barriers for healthy eating beyond the actual cost of food are not being considered in this article?
2) What other steps could/should the government take in promoting affordable healthy eating?
1) Another barrier for eating healthy is how unhealthy foods are made available and promoted. For example, fast food restaurants have become well-known over the last few decades for having consistent products and fast services. Their restaurants are very conveniently located between most people's commutes to and from work, home, school, etc. The combination between a familiar establishment, their well known food, and the convenience of fast service make eating unhealthy as easy as a phone call (if you decide to order pizza).
ReplyDelete2) I believe education is one of the best promoters of healthy eating. I think the government can promote affordable healthy eating by continuing health education programs, that teach students not only what a healthy diet is, but how to find and buy those items. However, I also believe a lot of responsibility should be placed on an individual to be able to make smart choices; a broad range of people know what they should and should not be eating, and they know the costs of such items when they visit the store. As the author stated, "oranges, apples or bananas — [are] all nutritious and cheap". With most people making more cutbacks in their spending, due to the state of the economy, I think more people are already spending less money on what they may want at the grocery store so they can afford more of what they need.
1) Educating people on health risks involved with different types of food and styles of cooking is very important. I come from an area where grandma cooks really good food but it is really unhealthy a lot of the time. And as people continue to live more sedentary lifestyles, they are not going to burn the calories off from eating fried meats at least three times a week. Basically, I think a greater effort should be made to make people more aware of the importance of healthy diets and exercise.
ReplyDelete2) Having typed my answer to question one before reading Michael's post, I completely agree with him that schools should educate students about health. I think it should start at a young age, but I do not agree with schools taking non-diet drinks out of the machines. While making students aware of healthy habits is good, keeping them from suffering the consequences of their decisions could be worse if we take the decisions away from them before they have a chance to make them. Plus, taking non-diet drinks out of the machines may make kids more likely to want/buy them elsewhere which could lead them to start eating more unhealthy things such as fast food.